The “few Jew-baiters,” wrote Michelle Goldberg, “are marginal, particularly compared to the large numbers of Jewish activists taking part.” She wrote that ECI’s accusation was “dishonest and deceptive.” It’s worse: If it weren’t such a serious subject — Marc Tracy calls the accusation “highly irresponsible” — labeling the whole movement as “anti-Semitic” would be laughable. Dan Sieradski of Occupy Judaism, which is seeking to rally Jewish supporters to the 99 Percent movement, dismissed the “couple of jerks and idiots” and noted that a thousand people turned out for high holiday services organized for the Occupy Wall Street protesters.
Protester
with 'hashtag' symbol
The attack
unleashed mostly by the neoconservative right on the 99 Percent Movement for
alleged pervasive anti-Semitism reached absurd new heights over the weekend and
early this week. An ad launched last week by the Bill Kristol-led Emergency Committee for Israel
(ECI) — whose hedge fund bankroller happens
to really hate financial regulation reform— made the rounds of the
mainstream media, getting picked up by Politico‘s Ben Smith
and the Washington Post‘s
neoconservative blogger Jennifer Rubin.
The ad,
which was largely ripped off from a pseudonymous Israeli neocon
blog (whose
author proclaims to be a “friend” of ECI’s
executive-director-in-title-only Noah Pollak),
portrayed anti-Semitic sentiments in videos of two people — one of them an admitted petty thief and
apparent camera-hungry provocateur — and a
photograph of a sign-holder. And other websites posted a woman expressing
anti-Semitic sentiments on a Reason video apparently
at L.A.’s protest. That’s four people out of hundreds of thousands worldwide that have participated in 99 Percent protests.
The “few Jew-baiters,” wrote Michelle Goldberg,
“are marginal, particularly compared to the large numbers of Jewish activists
taking part.” She wrote that ECI’s accusation was “dishonest and deceptive.”
It’s worse: If it weren’t such a serious subject — Marc Tracy calls the
accusation “highly irresponsible”
— labeling the whole movement as “anti-Semitic” would be laughable. Dan
Sieradski of Occupy Judaism, which is seeking to rally Jewish supporters to the
99 Percent movement, dismissed the “couple of jerks and idiots” and noted that
a thousand people turned out for high holiday services organized for the Occupy Wall Street protesters.
Despite
the seriousness of the charge — and the consequences of deploying it
frivolously — it’s difficult not to snicker at the continuing far-right attacks
on the 99 Percent Movement as anti-Semitic. Commentary launched a factually-challenged attack on New York’s Occupy Wall Street protest
movement. And Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government site said that staunch Israel supporter Rep. Steve israel (D-NY) supported an “anti-Israel/anti-Semitic”
cause.
But the
most ridiculous attack, by far, came from the far-right Pajamas Media website.
A writer going by the name “Zombie” — whose put up some of the most
raucously funny attacks on the 99 Percent Movement (“Commies and Kooks,”
etc.) — had a doozy of a post on Monday.
Organizers
at Denver’s 99 Percent Movement rally had taped a hashtag symbol — the pound signwhich is
now used in Twitter to tag a word — on their shirts. The mark was supposed to
make the organizers easy to identify in a crowd, but Zombie saw a much more
nefarious force at play: National Socialism!
"Zombie" wrote:
Don’t
these people see an echo of the swastika in their new power symbol? Don’t they realize that the early Nazi Party
was (among other things, obviously) also overtly anti-capitalist?… Don’t they know that the early Nazis tried
to garner sympathy with street rallies and marches?
When
informed in the comment section of the post that the symbol was merely a
Twitter symbol — and not a “bizarre neo-swastika” — Zombie continued to insist
the 99 Movement has Nazi tendencies:
As a
commenter notes, the symbol may have derived originally from the Twitter
“hashtag,” but that in no way
diminishes its creepiness. It may
“just” be a rotated hashtag, but that doesn’t lessen its significance as a
power symbol.The swastika, after all, was “just” a Buddhist good luck marking
before the Nazis adopted it and
started using it to indicate something else.
Jeffrey
Goldberg, the mainstream media’s self-appointed final arbiter of who is and
isn’t a Nazi and what is and isn’t anti-Semitic, has proclaimed that “Occupy Wall Street Is not
anti-Semitic.” The mainstream media should take heed of his judgment
and let the meme die, leaving it to the far-right symbologists and conspiracy
theorists.
Tags:
·
Nazis
·
Politico
0 Comments:
Post a Comment